Latarbelakang:

1. Artikel saya dan SEJARAHID.com yang fresh dan genuine dalam bahasa inggris dan bahasa indonesia muncul SERP #1 (Search Engine Result Page Number 1)

• How the Quran Brilliantly Anticipated the Age of Science with an Escape Clause for Superhuman Stories
• Bagaimana Al-Quran dengan Jenius Mengantisipasi Era Sains Modern dengan Sebuah Escape Clause untuk Kisah-Kisah Manusia Super (Superman)

2. Tapi GEMINI AI GOOGLE gagal memahami bahwa tulisan saya adalah secara khusus membahas “an Escape Clause for Superhuman Stories“, dan GEMINI melabeli tulisan saya yang bahasa indonesia sebagai “PENDAPAT YANG MENYESATKAN” dan sejenisnya. Sedangkan yang bahasa inggris tidak dilabeli “misleading”.

3. SEJARAHID protes ke GOOLE GEMINI APPS bahwa anda salah dalam memahami tulisan saya, ada 4 kesalahan:

• Gemini AI error in Keyword Weighting Bias,
• Truncation Bias,
• Attribution Error,
• Cross-Language Inconsistency.

4. GOOGLE GEMINI AI akhirnya mengakui ada masalah pada sistem AI dan “MOHON MAAF”.

5. SEJARAHID menerima permintaan maaf GOOGLE GEMINI AI.

6. #CASECLOSED

Technical Feedback Report – AI Overview (Gemini)

Source Article (Rank #1 SERP):
How the Quran Brilliantly Anticipated the Age of Science with an Escape Clause for Superhuman Stories

Issue:
AI Overview generated a summary that misrepresents the article’s focus.

• The article is exclusively about the escape clause for superhuman stories in the Quran (e.g., Abraham unharmed by fire, Solomon speaking with ants), interpreted allegorically rather than literally.
• However, AI Overview added unrelated themes of scientific miracles (embryology, cosmic expansion), which are not discussed in the article.

Technical Analysis:

1. Keyword Weighting Bias
   • Common terms (“Quran + Age of Science”) are overweighted.
   • Unique qualifiers (“Escape Clause + Superhuman Stories”) are underweighted.
2. Truncation Bias
   • Long title is truncated, so the model processes only the first clause, ignoring the crucial nuance in the second half.
3. Attribution Error
   • Content from unrelated sources (scientific miracles narrative) is blended into the article’s summary, erasing the author’s unique argument.

Impact:

• The top-ranked article is inaccurately represented in AI Overview.
• Readers are misled by added information that does not exist in the original source.

Suggested Fixes:

• Increase weighting of specific qualifiers in long titles (e.g., Escape Clause, Superhuman Stories).
• Require AI Overview to validate the main focus of the #1 SERP source before blending in background knowledge.
• Reduce over-generalization when the source provides a counter-narrative or unique focus.

Technical Feedback Report – Cross-Language Consistency Error in AI Overview (Gemini)

Source Article (Identical):
How the Quran Brilliantly Anticipated the Age of Science with an Escape Clause for Superhuman Stories

Issue

The AI Overview in English correctly integrates the unique argument of the article (escape clause for superhuman stories), though still blending it with general “scientific miracles” references.

However, the Indonesian response fails entirely to represent the source content. It introduces an unrelated theological/moral narrative (taqwa vs. Superman), misusing the “escape clause” concept and ignoring the author’s intended focus on mythological superhuman narratives.

Error Summary (Bahasa Indonesia vs English)

• English Response:
  Retains “scientific anticipation” + “escape clause for superhuman stories” → aligned with the article’s theme.
• Indonesian Response:
  Shifts completely into a taqwa/moral strength vs Superman comparison.
  Substitutes “escape clause” with theological reinterpretation, erasing the mythological analysis.

Specific Failures

1. Semantic Drift & Misappropriation
   – “Escape clause” redefined as taqwa/obedience/moral strength, a concept not present in the article.
2. Contextual Misalignment
   – Invents comparison points (Mukjizat vs Rekayasa, Superman) not mentioned in the source.
   – Ignores ancient mythology parallels (the actual content focus).
3. Cross-Language Inconsistency
   – English AI Overview captures the intended thesis.
   – Indonesian AI Overview produces a completely different argument structure, misleading Indonesian readers.

Impact

• Indonesian-speaking audiences are misled: the AI summary replaces the article’s mythological-critical approach with an unrelated sermon-like narrative.
• This undermines the reliability of AI Overview across languages.

Suggested Fixes

1. Improve Cross-Lingual Context Retention
   – Ensure identical source content yields consistent AI Overview across English and Indonesian.
2. Prioritize Source Terminology
   – Retain author’s unique phrases (“escape clause for superhuman stories”) without substituting them with theological generalizations.
3. Audit Indonesian Model Bias
   – Review tendency of Indonesian model to default into moral/theological framing when processing Quran-related keywords, even if the source context is academic/critical.